Levenson & Zenitz, Inc. v. Bonaparte
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore Citv. (Stump, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
This proceeding is an attempt to’ obtain by means of an. injunction the discontinuance of an existing trespass. There has been no proceeding at law for the ascertainment of the fact of the trespass, nor any damages recovered for the invasion complained of. The bill is not that the continuance of the trespass shall be enjoined, pending the action of a Court of law, but that substantive and permanent relief shall be given to the plaintiff by both mandatory and prohibitive injunction.
It is a familiar and well established rule of law, both in this and other States, that while for a single act of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Casey's Lessee v. InloesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1844
- White v. FlannigainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
- Stowers v. . GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Whalen v. DalashmuttCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Long v. RaganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Callahan v. ClemensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Mayor of Salisbury v. Camden Sewer Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
- International Pocketbook Workers' Union v. OrloveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Beers v. Automobile ClubBaltimore City Circuit Court · 1927