Legal Opinion

Schneckenberger v. John Bonura & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1930No. 13,536PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

This is a suit to enjoin execution under a judgment obtained by default. The allegations are that neither the plaintiff in injunction nor his attorney was present when the judgment in the original suit was obtained, and that their absence resulted from the fact that an agreement had been entered into between counsel for plaintiff and counsel for defendant in that suit, to the effect that counsel for plaintiff would notify, counsel for defendant of the fixing of the case for trial, and that no such notice was given. It is alleged in this suit that the breach of that agreement constitutes such…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Succession of GilmoreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Laenger v. LaengerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  3. Tarver v. QuinnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  4. Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Southern Wood Distillates & Fiber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  5. Succession of HerberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Lee v. CarrollLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Pannagl v. StouderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Bruton v. Traders & General InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API