Legal Opinion

Houseman v. Guaranty Securities Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1927No. 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment for $943.25 against Clarence Houseman and others. Based thereon, writ of garnishment was issued and served upon the Central National Bank of Dallas. The bank answered, admitting an indebtedness of $811.47 to Houseman and negativing any other liability. Houseman gave a replevy bond, with Dr. Guy F. Witt and . another as sureties, which recited the issuance and .service of the writ, and then proceeded:

“And whereas Clarence Houseman, defendant,, claims that he does hot own or. claim any part of the funds or -money in the hands of the Central National Bank, but that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seinsheimer v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Davis v. McFallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Amarillo Nat. Bank. v. SanbornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bennett Printing Co. v. Dines Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Kelsey v. LietzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API