Legal Opinion
W. R. Grace & Co. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 28, 1946No. 92PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. It has been suggested that the Board should have considered and decided the issue of the violation of Section 411 by treating the proceeding as if it involved Grace’s petition No. 744.2 But the scope of this proceeding (No. 779) is to be-measured, we think, by the directory part-of the Board’s order of September 10,. 1942; not by its recitals, save as these-may be necessary to throw light upon the-rest; nor by what the parties said in their arguments and briefs, or in the course of the hearings. Of course, we do not mean, that the order finally fixed the issues; but we…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- City of New York v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Colonial Airlines, Inc. v. JanasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Isbrandtsen Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.