Legal Opinion

Lieber, Exrx. v. Messick

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1930No. 13,929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.

George Middleton was employed by Robert Lieber to act as chauffeur for Lieber and his family during certain daylight hours of each day, for which services he was to, and did, receive a weekly wage. Middleton was also regularly employed by Edwin R. Klug as night foreman at the latter’s garage, where his hours of employment were from 7 o’clock in the evening until 7 o’clock in the morning of the next day. Lieber was a patron of the Klug garage, in which the Lieber automobile was kept and cared for when not in use. Klug was carrying no employers’ liability insurance, for which reason he-directed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kimball v. CushmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. ParkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Jimmo v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. Miller Et Ux.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Jackson Trucking Co. v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Uland v. LittleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. BonnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Princeton Mining Co. v. VeachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API