Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Economy Plumbing Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1925No. 7321PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

Harry C. Martin and E. J. Rohm, doing business under the style of Economy Plumbing Company, Albert Halbar-dier, Hilton T. Howell, and Otto J. LoelofC, the appellees herein, instituted an action against A. J. Robertson, Frank S. Huson, Byron J. Nankervis, Hobart Huson, Edward Snyder, and G. H. Nagel, alleging that Snyder and Nagel were indebted to Albert Hal-bardier in the sum of $125, to Hilton T. Howell in the sum of $340, to Martin and Rohm in the sum of $355.55, and to Locloff in the sum of $200, and that appellees have a lien on certain real estate which appellants have, advertised for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Southern Oil & Gas Co. v. Mexia Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Johnson v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Lingwiler v. LingwilerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. White v. FerrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bledsoe v. MackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. City of Groveton v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Zanes v. Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API