Legal Opinion
Claim of Meyers v. Robeson Industries
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 1, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 22, 1993, which ruled that claimant was permanently and totally disabled.
We conclude that there was substantial evidence in the record to support the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Board that claimant suffered from total disability and not only marked partial disability, as asserted by the employer and its workers’ compensation carrier (see, e.g., Matter of Walker v Twin Indus. Corp., 101 AD2d 667). In view of the testimony of Ben Benatar, claimant’s treating orthopedist, that claimant had a "total”,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claim of Zanotti v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Claim of Boyce v. Michelangelo General ContractorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Claim of Messina v. SperanzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Claim of Baker v. Three Village Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Claim of Reitzen v. Brooklyn Carpet ExchangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Eaton v. Dellapenna AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Claim of Malerba v. Ameron Global, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Claim of Malerba v. Ameron Global, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014