Hernandez v. Childers
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the following reasons, it is granted in part and denied in part.
On a motion to dismiss, the allegations of the complaint as well as the reasonable inferences to be drawn from them are taken as true. Doe v. St. Joseph’s Hosp., 788 F.2d 411 (7th Cir.1986). The plaintiff need not set out in detail the facts upon which a claim is based, but must allege sufficient facts to outline the cause of action. Id. The complaint must state either direct or inferential allegations concerning all of the material elements…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- B. Doe, M.D., on Behalf of B. Doe and B. Doe's Patients v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Fort WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,975 Michelle K. Tomera, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Arthur T. Galt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Estate of Wernick v. MacKsIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Havoco of America, Ltd., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Sumitomo Corporation of America, and Elmer C. Hill, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Byelick v. VivadelliDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Adams v. Cavanagh Communities Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Whirlpool Financial Corp. v. GN Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Southern Track & Pump, Inc. v. Terex Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.