Legal Opinion

Rich v. Henderson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1917No. 3034PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Original application for writ of mandamus by Edward I. Rich against H. H. Henderson and others.

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, J.

The plaintiff herein filed an original application for a peremptory writ of mandate to issue out of this court commanding the defendants, as a board of canvassers at an election, to assemble and order and direct the issuance of a certificate of election to the plaintiff, as a member of the board of education of Ogden City, Utah.

The facts, substantially as stated in the application, are as follows: That the defendants H. H. Henderson, Wade M. Johnson, W. H. Williams, Fred E. Williams, and J. W. Leve-dahl were and now are members of the board of education of Ogden City, Utah, and the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Page v. Utah CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Brown v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. MossUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Palmer v. Board of Co. Canv. of Morgan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API