Legal Opinion

Baum v. Winston

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 22, 1860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

CASE 32- APPEAL PROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT. cited Civil Code, sec. 153; 2 Met., 341 ; 14 B. Mon., 394; 13 lb., 339. cited 13 B. Mon., 332 ; 18 B. Mon., 229 ; Civil Code, sec. 153. cited, 1 Chitty's Pleading, 10th Am. Ed., 100-1 ; 1 Hilliard on Torts, 44; 2 Phillips on Ev., 115; 1 J. J. Mar., 544; Civil Code, s/c. 153; 14 R. Mon., 394; 15 lb., 630; Hall vs. Porter, MS. opinion, Winter Term, 1859; 1 J. J. Mar., 366; 2 J.J. Mar., 520.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE DUVALL

delivered the opinion op the court:

The material allegations of the petition are : That the defendant owed the plaintiff $140 lor the hire of her negro man Ed, for the year 1849, (intended doubtless for 1859;) that the' defendant had hired said negro ; that he shad- said boy in his possession for the term aforesaid, and had and received the product of the boy’s service to the amount or worth of $140, *128which sum was due 1st January, 1860; and in an amended petition it is alleged that the defendant was to furnish the boy with necessary clothing, which he failed to do, and that the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gnau v. AckermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Cotton v. MarshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Moore v. LinnemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Adkins v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API