Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Arthur D. Little, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 6, 1996No. Civil Action 96-10607-NGPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GERTNER, District Judge:

This case concerns the tangled web of copyrights, trademarks, licenses and understandings between former partners in the “Leadership Training” field. Plaintiffs Robert Fritz and his wholly-owned companies Dimensional Mind Approach (“DMA”) and Technologies For Creating (“TFC”) (hereinafter collectively “Fritz”) claim that defendants Arthur Little, Inc., Charles Kiefer, Jr., Innovation Associates, Inc. I (“IA Inc I”) and its successor Innovation Associates, Inc. II (“IA Inc. II”), have infringed several of plaintiffs’ copyrights and plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Tom Doherty Associates, Inc. D/B/A Tor Books v. Saban Entertainment, Inc. And Saban International N.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. John H. Harland Company, Cross-Appellant v. Clarke Checks, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Boustany v. Boston Dental Group, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  2. Public Impact, LLC v. Boston Consulting Group, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  3. Commerce Bank & Trust Co. v. TD Banknorth, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  4. Feldman v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  5. Green Book International Corp. v. Inunity Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API