Legal Opinion

Philadelphia National Bank v. Snydman

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided March 3, 1936No. 6785Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kun, J.,

Plaintiff, The Philadelphia National Bank, issued its writ of assumpsit and filed a statement of claim against Nathan Snydman and Sarah Snydman demanding from defendants the sum of $2,600 with interest from September 10, 1931. The cause of action is based upon a note signed by Nathan and Sarah Snydman on June 10, 1931, payable three months after date, to the order of “ourselves”, in the amount of $2,600. This note was endorsed by the makers, Nathan and Sarah Snydman, to the Northwestern Trust Company on June 10,1931. Various paragraphs of plaintiff’s statement of claim were admitted…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Putnam v. Ensign Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Lancaster County National Bank v. HenningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Third National Bank v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Wirebach's v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  5. Strause v. BraunreuterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API