Legal Opinion

Rairden v. Winstandley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1885No. 11,798PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J. —

The second paragraph of the appellee’s complaint counts upon a promissory note alleged to have been executed by the appellants, but the note is not identified nor in any way referred to as forming a part of the pleading. It is not stated that a copy is filed with the complaint, nor is any reference made to it except to give a general description of its legal tenor and effect. As it is not averred that a copy of the note is filed with the pleading, and as it is not set out therein, it must be held that the court erred in overruling the appellants’ demurrer. This is not a case…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Price v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Stafford v. DavidsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Sinker, Davis & Co. v. FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Williams v. OsbonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Hiatt v. GobltIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smythe v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API