Legal Opinion
Peoples Bank v. Eccles
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 14, 1946No. Civil Action No. 32200PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IIOLTZOFF, Justice.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment. The plaintiff is the Peoples Bank, a banking corporation organized under the laws of the State of California. The defendants are members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The purpose of the action is to secure an adjudication that one of the conditions attached to the plaintiff’s admission to membership in the Federal Reserve System is invalid, null and void. The defendants move to dismiss the complaint on the ground that no jxisticiable controversy is presented and that, therefore, the action does not lie.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Perkins v. ElgSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eccles v. Peoples Bank of Lakewood VillageSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Peoples Bank v. EcclesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Gary v. Marquette Cas. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Elkins v. VanaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Eccles v. Peoples Bank of Lakewood VillageSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.