Ross v. Bowling
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This appeal was improvidently taken from an interlocutory order in an action formerly cognizable at law. We have elected to treat the appeal as a petition for certiorari. See Lovi v. North Shore Bank, Fla.App.1962, 137 So.2d 585; Aetna Insurance Company v. Jordan, Fla. App.1966, 189 So.2d 408.
The order presented for review denied the plaintiffs’ motion to join an insurance company after the decision of the Supreme Court of Florida in Shingleton v. Bussey, Fla. 1969, 223 So.2d 713. We think that under the established law this order was a departure from the essential requirements of the' law.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shingleton v. BusseySupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Beta Eta House Corporation v. GregoryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Aetna Insurance Company v. JordanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Lovi v. North Shore BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Shipman v. KindermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jenkins v. JacobsenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970