Legal Opinion
Spradling v. City of Tulsa
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 5, 2000No. 98-5204PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, present and retired District Chiefs of Defendant City of Tulsa’s fire department, brought suit for overtime compensation pursuant to § 207 of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for the period March 30, 1995 through June 30, 1997. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. Defendant claims Plaintiffs were not entitled to overtime pay because they came within the exemption for “bona fide executive, administrative, or professional” employees provided by § 213(a)(1). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant and Plaintiffs appeal. We exercise…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Block v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- O'Brien v. Town of AgawamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust v. XTO Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Herrera v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Reed v. McKuneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.