Legal Opinion

Ladonio-Dennis-Jones v. Hope Fertilizer Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 28, 1931No. 4040PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the case as above).

The poifit presented for decision is that of the liability of a married woman for indebtedness incurred by her for the commercial fertilizer used in the cultivation of her farm, the separate property of the wife, to make the land fruitful and more abundant in production. She planted and raised a crop on the land. The appellant contends that she, being a married woman, was without legal authority to incur the indebtedness for the fertilizer because such indebtedness was not for the benefit of her separate property, but rather for the benefit of the community…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Whitney Hardware Co. v. McMahanTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Cauble v. Beaver-Electra Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Gohlman, Lester & Co. v. WhittleTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Teel v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Stroter v. BrackenridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turbeville v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API