Legal Opinion

Mariani v. Price Waterhouse

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1999No. F026343PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VARTABEDIAN, J.

J.Plaintiffs David W. Mariani, Herbert R. Benham, Jr., and the David W. Mariani Investment Partnership (Mariam Investment Partnership) (appellants) appeal from a judgment entered in favor of respondent Price Waterhouse. The cause below arose from appellants’ assertion that respondent allegedly misrepresented the financial condition of a corporation whose debts appellants guaranteed. As to two counts, the trial court sustained respondent’s demurrer without leave to amend; as to the remaining counts, the court granted summary judgment for respondent. We affirm the judgment.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. North American Chemical Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Alling v. Universal Manufacturing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. CNF INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Glenn K. Jackson Inc., Dba Jackson & Donahue Glenn K. Jackson v. Richard Roe Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & JamesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Alcott Rehabilitation Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Lopes v. VieiraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2007
  5. Bowden v. Cnf Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API