Foster v. Wickliffe

{¶ 100} Although the Fosters assert a myriad of different arguments in support of their appeal, I believe that the issues surrounding their second and third assignments of error are dispositive of the instant matter. In their second and third assignments of error, the Fosters claim, inter alia, that the trial court erred by failing to follow the law of the case established by this court’s 1999 holding in Donsante v. Wickliffe (Oct. 29,1999), 11th Dist. Nos. 98-L-046 and 98-L-047, 1999 WL 1074115. Appellant’s argument presupposes that our holding in Donsante, a case in which appellants…