Legal Opinion
Bowen v. Chandler
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1912No. Docket No. 38Published
Error to Cheboygan; Shepherd, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by David Bowen against Merritt Chandler for the value of an engine and boiler. From a judgment for plaintiff defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
This is an action brought in assumpsit to recover the value of an engine and boiler, which, it is claimed, was exchanged by the plaintiff with the defendant for certain real estate. The declaration filed in the cause contains the following count :
“For that whereas, said defendant, before the commencement of said suit, was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $300 lawful money of the United States for divers *680goods, wares, and merchandise of the said plaintiff, to wit, one engine and boiler, theretofore delivered to the defendant at his special instance and request under contract of exchange of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zimmerman Manufacturing Co. v. DolphMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Prince v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Harris Photographic Supply Co. v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Kendrick v. HochradelMichigan Supreme Court · 1911