Legal Opinion

Grusiecki v. Jaglay

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 48, Calendar No. 36,347PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

May 26, 1926, plaintiff was in arrears in payments on a land contract. His vendors commenced summary proceedings to recover possession. Plaintiff consulted defendant, who is an insurance agent and notary public and bad once examined an abstract for him. He claims defendant agreed to take care of the case for him, and, for doing so, he paid him a fee of $25. Defendant arranged with the attorney for vendors for adjournment of proceedings from June 16th to June 23d, and again to June 30th. On the latter date judgment of restitution was entered.

Plaintiff brought this suit for damages on the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bostrom v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Battle Creek Food Co. v. KirklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Janssen v. KohlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Clingerman v. BruceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Board of County Road Commissioners of MontcalmDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API