Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. Hilton's Mechanical Men, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1996No. 95CA1051PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CASEBOLT.

Petitioner, Lloyd M. Ackerman (claimant), seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel (Panel) that affirmed an order of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ordering his compensation reduced by fifty percent pursuant to § 8-42-112(l)(c), C.R.S. (1995 Cum.Supp.) (injuries resulting from intoxication). We affirm.

While driving a van in the course of his employment with Hilton’s Mechanical Men, Inc., claimant lost control and suffered com-pensable injuries in a one-car accident. It was undisputed that, shortly after the accident, a blood alcohol test…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grover v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Kraus v. Artcraft Sign Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Snyder Oil Co. v. EmbreeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. May D & F v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Baca v. HelmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colorado Department of Labor & Employment v. EsserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. JunielColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Arenas v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Popke v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Sears v. Penrose HospitalColorado Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API