Legal Opinion
Eaton v. Montana Silversmiths
District Court, D. Montana
Decided January 16, 2025No. 1:18-cv-00065Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION ROBERT A. EATON, Case No. CV 18-65-BLG-SPW Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO VS. COMPEL MONTANA SILVERSMITHS, Defendant. Before the Court is Plaintiff Robert A. Eaton’s motion to compel the production of Defendant’s Montana Silversmiths (“MTS”) taxes. (Docs 183; 184). The Court denies the motion for the forgoing reasons. 1. Background Eaton originally asserted seven causes of action against MTS: (1) retaliation under Title VII; (2) wrongful termination; (3) disability discrimination; (4) age discrimination; (5)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Xin Liu v. Amway Corporation Does 1-50 InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Millie B. Heathman v. United States District Court for the Central District of California,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Hilt v. SFC Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.