Legal Opinion

In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action B-10489

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 11, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5548PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED OPINION

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

This appeal follows the juvenile court’s order certifying appellant as nonacceptable to adopt children.

On May 16,1984, the Pima County Attorney filed a petition for preadoption certification on behalf of appellant in accordance with A.R.S. §§ 8-105 and 8-127. The petition was appended to an adoptive home study (“written report”), appellant’s application to adopt a child and appellant’s autobiography, which together contained the information required by A.R.S. § 8-105(C). The written report was prepared by a Department of Economic Security (“division”)…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bowers v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Bank v. Mesa N. O. Nelson Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. A-25525Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. In Re Js & C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. N. K. M. v. L. E. M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-132905Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. In Re Andrew A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. In re the Adoption of CamillaNew York City Family Court · 1994
  4. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action B-10489Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API