Legal Opinion

Lithgow v. Pearson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1913No. 3723Published

Appeal from Denver District Court. Hon'. G-eobge W. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

Counsel for appellee in his petition for rehearing makes no complaint concerning the conclusion reached by us in the original opinion handed down in this case, in so far as we determined that his client, Bear Pearson, obtained no title to the land involved by reason of the deed which he obtained from the railroad company, or its grantees. But he calls our attention to the fact that as to the thirty feet of lot 14, block 15, being the property claimed by appellant Lederer, Pearson claims title through another and second source, viz.: a quit claim deed from the alleged heirs of one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dyer v. MarriottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API