Legal Opinion

Lively v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 2, 1984No. 83-AB-909-A; 83-AB-909-B; CA A28647PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board that affirmed a referee’s decision disqualifying him from receiving unemployment compensation benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.1 A detailed statement of the facts in this case — such as they are — would benefit neither bench nor bar. Petitioner argues — and we agree — that none of the findings of fact in any of the decisions of the referee or the EAB support its conclusion. An examination of the record further shows that there is no way the findings of fact could be recast to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sothras v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. De St. Germain v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Hoard v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API