Venero v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment entered below in all respects. See § 790.235, Fla. Stat. (1997); State v. Maxwell, 682 So.2d 83 (Fla.1996); Arnold v. State, 645 So.2d 418 (Fla.1994); Johnson v.. State, 726 So.2d 359 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Higgs v. State, 695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Love v. State, 569 So.2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); State v. Coron, 411 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We recognize that our position on the defendant’s constitutional challenge to his sentence undér Chapter 95-182 is in conflict with the position taken by the Second District in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Higgs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Love v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- State v. CoronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Venero v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000