Legal Opinion

Venero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 22, 1999No. 98-2037PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment entered below in all respects. See § 790.235, Fla. Stat. (1997); State v. Maxwell, 682 So.2d 83 (Fla.1996); Arnold v. State, 645 So.2d 418 (Fla.1994); Johnson v.. State, 726 So.2d 359 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Higgs v. State, 695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Love v. State, 569 So.2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); State v. Coron, 411 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We recognize that our position on the defendant’s constitutional challenge to his sentence undér Chapter 95-182 is in conflict with the position taken by the Second District in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Higgs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Love v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  5. State v. CoronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Venero v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API