Legal Opinion

Gingerich v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 2, 2003No. 03-5027PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

Fenton and Eunice Gingerich, Seung and Young Ho Karl, Choong and Joung Kim, Eugene Rosol, Charles Scruggs, Dae-Sob and Moon Yoon, Albert and Dorothy Liebovich, Carl and Nellie Liebovich, Gregory and Gail Liebovich, Joe and Belle Liebovich, Larry and Barbara Liebovich, and Samuel and Erna Liebovich (collectively the “Appellants” or “Taxpayers”) appeal from the Court of Federal Claims’ decision on summary judgment that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) timely assessed the Taxpayers. Gingerich v. United States, 54 Fed. Cl. 222 (2002). Because there exist genuine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winstar Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Linear Technology Corporation v. Micrel, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Cinema '84 v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Gingerich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gingerich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Gingerich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API