State v. Krumme
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The complaint of the plaintiff alleges in substance that the defendant, an attorney, commingled trust funds with his own, 1 withheld payment of distributive shares to the heirs for an unreasonable length of time, misrepresented the degree of difficulty of the services performed, charged an exorbitant fee for such services, offered to split his fee with the attorney for the administratrix of the estate, and did not carry out the suggestions made by an attorney of the District Four Grievance Committee of the State Bar after agreeing that he would.
The factual allegations of the complaint are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. RoggensackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. BartoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. KernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. MarkeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. McNamaraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. BrookshawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975