Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Anguiano v. Neven

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 6, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00406Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 JEANNE ANGUIANO, Case No. 2:19-cv-00406-APG-NJK 4 Petitioner, v. ORDER 5 DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., 6 Respondents. 7 8 9 This habeas matter under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

comes before the court on the respondents’ 10 motion to dismiss petitioner Jeanne Anguiano’s pro se petition as untimely. ECF No. 7. I agree 11 that the petition is untimely so I will dismiss it. 12 I. AEDPA Statute of Limitations 13 The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) imposes a one-year 14 limitation period on the filing of federal habeas corpus petitions. 28…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Willie Lee Miles v. K.W. Prunty, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Ibrahn Ben Miranda v. Ray Castro, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Sergey Spitsyn v. Robert Moore, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API