City of Aurora v. Fox
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Dearborn Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
Appellees’ complaint is in two paragraphs. • One at least is good, and, as the demurrer was addressed to the entire complaint, it was properly overruled, even though one of the paragraphs is bad.
The complaint alleges, in substance, that the City of Aurora, without having adopted any general plan for the improvement of the streets, and without having advertised for proposals, and also without having entered into a written contract, proceeded to dig into and cut down a street upon which appellees’ house and lot were situated, and without right hauled away and appropriated the soil of said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wood v. MearsIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- City of Delphi v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- City of Vincennes v. RichardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- City of Terre Haute v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cummins v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Crowder v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Platter v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Washington Hotel Realty Co. v. Bedford Stone & Construction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Byer v. Town of New CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.