Affiliated Capital Corporation, Etc. v. City of Houston, Gulf Coast Cable Television and James J. McConn
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARZA, Circuit Judge:
In Affiliated Capital Corp. v. City of Houston, 519 F.Supp. 991 (S.D.Tex.1981), the district court granted the defendant’s judgment n.o.v. motion in an antitrust action because 5t believed there was insuffi“ent evidence f0n,necting Plaintiffs ^ ^ conspiracy to llmlt competition and its failure í a cable television franchise. A divided panel of this court re- . in , _ . . r ™vsed *hat decisi0n holdmg am°ng things that the conspiracy complained of was a per se antitrust violation. Affiliated Capital Corp. v. City of Houston, 700 F.2d 226 (5th Cir.1983). We vacated that…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Errol Lynch v. Joseph S. Cannatella, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Hertz Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Video International Production, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Warner-Amex Cable Communications, Inc., the City of Dallas, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Greenwood Utilities Commission v. Mississippi Power Company, Greenwood Utilities Commission v. Mississippi Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.