Legal Opinion

Goodrich v. Hanson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1864PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Shelby county; the Hon. Charles H. Constable, Judge, presiding. This was an action of trover instituted in the court below by Henry 0. Goodrich against Nathaniel Hanson and John M. Pearson, to recover the value of two mules. The defendants pleaded the general issue.

Read the full summary

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Shelby county; the Hon. Charles H. Constable, Judge, presiding. This was an action of trover instituted in the court below by Henry 0. Goodrich against Nathaniel Hanson and John M. Pearson, to recover the value of two mules. The defendants pleaded the general issue. It appears that previously to the bringing of this suit, Goodrich had placed the mules in the hands of one Hammer, as his agent, and while they were so held, Hanson and Pearson instituted a suit in replevin against Hammer for their recovery. In that action Hammer pleaded property in Goodrich,…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Jhstice Walker

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Was there such a privity between Hammer and Goodrich as authorized the depositions and proceedings in the replevin suit to be read in evidence in this case ? It appears that Goodrich placed the mules in the hands of Hammer as his agent, and whilst they were so held, Pearson instituted a replevin suit against Hammer for their recovery. Hammer took the deposition of Whitsit, from whom both parties to this suit claim to derive title to the mules, to be read in evidence on the trial of the replevin suit. Pearson had due notice of the time…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wade v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Ault v. RawsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Johnson v. MathewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
  3. C. H. Albers Commission Co. v. SesselIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Briggs v. BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Kelsey v. SnyderIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API