Legal Opinion

Drespel v. Drespel

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1935No. 3075PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

COLEMAN, JV:

• Plaintiff recovered judgment in a divorce action. Defendant moved for a new trial upon the grounds of newly discovered evidence and for counsel fees and court costs in prosecuting said motion for a new trial.’ The court denied all the motions, and the defendant has appealed.

We will first dispose of the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial.

Pursuant to our civil practice act, a new trial may be granted upon the ground of newly discovered evidence which the moving party could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced at the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Duss v. DussSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Lewis v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Harley v. . PlantNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Worthington v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Henderson v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ballin v. BallinNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Wilson v. WilsonNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Raabe v. RaabeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  4. Moore v. MooreNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Coe v. CoeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API