State v. Jones

¶22 Prior to the entry of his admissions to the alleged probation violations, Jones indicated that he had not been promised a *181recommended disposition and his counsel acknowledged there was no agreement between the parties about the disposition. On that basis, the District Court accepted Jones’ admissions to the alleged violations. The District Court was advised about the Silver Bow plea agreement and order only after Jones had entered his plea. While I am willing to accept the Court’s conclusion that Jones was relying upon the Silver Bow plea agreement when tendering his admissions, and…