Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 25, 2013No. 20100840-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Amended Memorandum Decision1

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

T 1 Defendant James Errol Campbell challenges his jury conviction for possession of a controlled substance, see Utah Code Ann. § 58-87-8@)(a)() (2007), specifically asserting that his conviction should be reversed because the trial court erred in denying his request to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of possession of drug paraphernalia, see id. § 58-87Ta-5(1). We affirm.

[ 2 The State charged Defendant with possession of a controlled substance, see id. § 58-37-8(2)(a)(), after Officers Laursen and Hubbard discovered that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. PowellUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. CrickUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. KrugerUtah Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SalgadoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API