Legal Opinion

City of Covington v. Crolley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 21, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Morris, Commissioner—

Affirming.

The canse, as tried below, presented a question of construction of ordinance of the City of Covington (second class), and the city civil service law, contained in Sections 3235h-l to and including 3235h-12, 1938 Supp. The controversy was begun by the filing of a petition to which the city and certain officers were made parties defendant, submitted to the court on the defendant’s general demurrer, and substantially on the following agreed facts:

Crolley was employed on June 1, 1934, as a laborer' in the water distribution service of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Jacobs v. CoffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Aulich v. CraigmyleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Winslow v. BullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. State ex rel. Sonnenberg v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Covington v. CrolleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  2. City of Covington v. TrenkampCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Ritte v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API