Legal Opinion
Bautz v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 31, 2006No. 4D06-1790PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The denial of Bautz’s rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence is affirmed without prejudice. Bautz may raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a timely and legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Catlin v. State, 929 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Lee v. State, 637 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Catlin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eason v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006