Legal Opinion

Bautz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 31, 2006No. 4D06-1790PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The denial of Bautz’s rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence is affirmed without prejudice. Bautz may raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a timely and legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Catlin v. State, 929 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Lee v. State, 637 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Catlin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eason v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006