Jackson v. the State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Presiding Judge.
Following a jury trial, Prentiss Ashon Jackson was convicted of failing to register as a sex offender in violation of OCGA § 42-1-12. Jackson appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial, contending that the trial court erred in denying his general demurrer to the indictment. Jackson also contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
Viewed in the light most favorable to Jackson’s conviction, 1 the evidence shows that on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Grace v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- State v. ShabazzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Dixson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Darius Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- JACKSON v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017