Legal Opinion
Rapp v. Rapp
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided May 31, 1904PublishedCited by 8 opinions
On bill for divorce on the ground of the defendant’s adultery.
1Opinion of the Court
Reed, V. C.
The testimony supports the finding of a master that the defendant, between the months of August and December, 1901, committed adultery with one Albert Searle.
The complainant swears, however, that he left his wife in March, 1897, and has never lived with her since. He assigns as cause for leaving her that she drank and ran around with other men and carried on so that he could not live with her. He seems never to have sought her since he left her.
The facts, so barely stated by him, display a desertion by the husband, a separation from his wife without her consent for no proved cause,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Courson v. CoursonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Núñez v. LópezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1943
- Thomsen v. ThomsenOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Huster v. HusterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- C. v. C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.