Legal Opinion

Szost v. Dykman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 44, Calendar No. 35,025PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is an automobile collision case in . which defendant filed cross suit for damages and the jury found no cause of action as to both claims. The principal question is whether the court erred in refusing to submit to the jury the question of what is variously called gross, discovered, or subsequent negligence.

In setting out the facts, we will accept plaintiff’s version of the accident. Bridge street in Grand Rapids runs east and west, is a through traffic thoroughfare, and has a street car track in the center. Lane avenue crosses it and is a stop street. Plaintiff drove north on Lane…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Davidson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Thornton v. City of FlintMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Churukian v. LaGestMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Sloan v. AmbroseMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Gallagher v. WalterMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API