Legal Opinion

Turk v. Grossman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 3, 1941No. [No. 72, October Term, 1940.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The problem in this case has arisen on the distribution of a decedent’s estate. The appellant, trustee under the will of Heinrich Turk, and his widow, excepted to the allowance made to a former wife of a lump sum of $25,-500 with interest, to represent or replace an annuity which the decedent had agreed to pay that former wife during her life. The sum is greater than any estimate value of the annuity, and the claim to it is founded on an alleged compromise agreement, acquiescence and estoppel. The exceptions were dismissed, and the appeal has followed.

Many of the introductory facts have been…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maddux v. BevanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  2. Howard v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  3. Packham v. German Fire Ins., Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  4. Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  5. Abrams v. EckenrodeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. FrazerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. Tilghman v. FrazerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  3. Hightstown Rug Co. v. National Savings & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API