Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Erickson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 18, 1998No. SC 15860PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BORDEN, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether, pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 45a-257 (a), the trial court should have admitted extrinsic evidence regarding the decedent’s intent that *361his will would not be revoked automatically by his subsequent marriage.2 The named plaintiff, Alicia Erickson,3 who is the daughter of the decedent, Ronald K. Erickson, appeals4 from the judgment of the trial court *362in favor of the defendant, Dorothy Erickson,5 the executrix of the estate of the decedent, dismissing the plaintiffs appeal from the decree of the Probate Court for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Connecticut Junior Republic v. Sharon HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Fulton Trust Co. v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. Strong v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Blake v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. Czepiel v. CzepielSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Radin v. Jewish National FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & PagosIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Flannery v. McNamaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Palozie v. PalozieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API