Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Fort Dodge & Omaha Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 29, 1902Published

Appeal from, Pottawattamie District Court. — Hon. N. W. Macy, Judge. Action for damages. From judgment dismissing his petition, the plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, O. J.

-The defendant had laid the ties and rails on its road to the south of Logan, but this had not been leveled or ballasted. Its construction train consisted of thirteen flat cars, used for hauling dirt, and two box cars, —one for tools, and the other for the crew. One box car was immediately in front of the engine, and in front of that, the fiat cars. The other box car was'behind it. The men had been picked up, as usual, at several points along the track, and were being taken to Logan for dinner. They were scattered along the flat cars in various positions, ■while the deceased, with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Files v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Conners v. Burlington C. R. & N. R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. Glover v. ScottenMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Jeffrey v. K. & D. M. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API