Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 7, 1937No. 8585PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was for damages suffered by appellee in a crossing collision between one of appellant’s locomotives and an automobile in which she was riding with her husband. The claim was that those operating the locomotive were negligent in backing over the crossing without giving the signals, and keeping the lookout due care demanded, and that this negligence, concurring with that of the driver of the automobile, was the proximate cause of her injury. Defendant, joining issue and pleading contributory negligence, there was a trial to a jury with a verdict for plaintiff.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miller v. Union Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Watts v. Montgomery Traction Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Cooper v. AgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Morley v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Nathan R. Underwood and Richard M. Murray, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. Allen v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Van Allen v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  5. Allen v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API