Legal Opinion
Crockett v. Johns-Manville Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 11, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 81-1268Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES McGIRR KELLY, District Judge.
Presently before this Court is defendant Jaquays Asbestos Company’s motion for *255summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56.
Plaintiffs, Mr. & Mrs. Crockett, in their complaint basically allege that the defendant here was a supplier of asbestos to the company which Mr. Crockett worked for, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Mr. Crockett contends that as a consequence of being exposed in the work place to asbestos, he suffered injury. Mrs. Crockett’s claim is based upon the fact that she came into contact with the asbestos through Mr. Crockett’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Inglett & Company, Inc. v. Everglades Fertilizer Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Richard D. Hoover v. Switlik Parachute Company, Co-Defendant-Appellant, Pioneer Systems, Inc., Co-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- William Edward Roucher v. Traders & General Insurance Company, Dallas, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- The Mercantile National Bank At Dallas v. The Franklin Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Kohr v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.