Presti v. Schalck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs, on the court’s own motion. Memorandum: The order directing plaintiffs to answer certain questions at a pretrial examination was not appealable as a matter of right (Brimberg v. Frielich, 10 A D 2d 850; Brown v. Golden, 6 A D 2d 766) and appellants failed to obtain the required permission to appeal (CPLR 5701, subd. [e]). (Appeal from order of Niagara Special Term requiring plaintiffs to answer certain questions and make full disclosure of all matters pertaining to said questions.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Roggow v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Mayer v. HoangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Berecz v. ReszelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- MAYER, WILLIAM J. v. HOANG, HENRYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Maisch v. Millard Fillmore HospitalsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.