Legal Opinion

Presti v. Schalck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 22, 1966PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs, on the court’s own motion. Memorandum: The order directing plaintiffs to answer certain questions at a pretrial examination was not appealable as a matter of right (Brimberg v. Frielich, 10 A D 2d 850; Brown v. Golden, 6 A D 2d 766) and appellants failed to obtain the required permission to appeal (CPLR 5701, subd. [e]). (Appeal from order of Niagara Special Term requiring plaintiffs to answer certain questions and make full disclosure of all matters pertaining to said questions.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roggow v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Mayer v. HoangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Berecz v. ReszelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. MAYER, WILLIAM J. v. HOANG, HENRYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Maisch v. Millard Fillmore HospitalsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API