Legal Opinion

Arnold Motor Co. v. C. I. T. Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1941No. 11230PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CODY, Justice.

On January 31, 1941, appellee, plaintiff below, filed this suit against appellants, defendants below. On the same day, without notice, the court upon the sworn allegations of the petition appointed Neal Polk as receiver to take possession of some certain eighty-five automobiles from defendants and to hold the same subject to the further orders of the court. On February S, 1941, the receiver reported to the .court the automobiles which he had taken into his possession under order of the court, and their condition and where he had stored them, and represented to the court that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co. v. BruhlmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Needham v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Massey v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Associated Bankers Credit Co. v. MeisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Charles ClayYoung v. Louise Johnson, Toy Young, and Hubert BarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. Pamela Mehl v. David Stern, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  4. Pamela Mehl v. David Stern, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  5. Pamela Mehl v. David Stern, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API