Arnold Motor Co. v. C. I. T. Corp.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CODY, Justice.
On January 31, 1941, appellee, plaintiff below, filed this suit against appellants, defendants below. On the same day, without notice, the court upon the sworn allegations of the petition appointed Neal Polk as receiver to take possession of some certain eighty-five automobiles from defendants and to hold the same subject to the further orders of the court. On February S, 1941, the receiver reported to the .court the automobiles which he had taken into his possession under order of the court, and their condition and where he had stored them, and represented to the court that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co. v. BruhlmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Needham v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Massey v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
3Cited by5 opinions
- Associated Bankers Credit Co. v. MeisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Charles ClayYoung v. Louise Johnson, Toy Young, and Hubert BarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Pamela Mehl v. David Stern, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
- Pamela Mehl v. David Stern, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
- Pamela Mehl v. David Stern, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015