Legal Opinion

Blue Goose Growers, Inc. v. Yuma Groves, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1981No. 79-3158PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Blue Goose Growers, Inc. (Blue Goose) appeals from the dismissal of its counterclaim for abuse of process in a suit brought by the above named Yuma Groves corporations (Yuma) for breach of contract and other violations. The District Court entered the necessary certification under Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b). We note jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, find no act by Yuma which constitutes an illegitimate use of legal process under Arizona law, and affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

The several Yuma corporations are apparently wholly owned by City Bank, N.A., of New York, and grow citrus and other fruits in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joseph, Md v. Markovitz, MdCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. Rondelli v. County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nienstedt v. WetzelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Keen v. RuddyAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. MHC, Inc. v. International Union, United Mine WorkersDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1988
  5. Gregg v. U.S. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API