Legal Opinion

Rose v. Northrup

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Demuebeb by defendant to the plaintiffs’ complaint upon the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

1Opinion of the CourtKruse, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiffs, the owners of certain lands situate in the city of Olean in the county of Cattaraugus, to set aside a sale of their said lands *239made by the county treasurer of that county for taxes assessed therefor against them, upon the ground that the sale was unauthorized and void and that the conveyance made by the county treasurer to the purchaser on such sale is a cloud upon the title of the plaintiffs.

The precise ‘claim of the plaintiffs is. that inasmuch as the tax debtors, the owners of the lands,— the plaintiffs herein,— were residents of the city of Olean,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chard v. . HoltNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Board of Supervisors v. BettsNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reese v. NorthrupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Tysen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API